<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Directories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-mind.com/category/directories/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-mind.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine News, Social Networking News, Search Engine Marketing, SEO Tips</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does Google Finally Accept DMOZ Failures?</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-mind.com/directories/does-google-finally-accept-dmoz-failures.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seo-mind.com/directories/does-google-finally-accept-dmoz-failures.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny G Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directory submission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMOZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open directory project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo directory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-mind.com/directories/does-google-finally-accept-dmoz-failures.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>Recently, Google removed the “Submit your site to relevant directories such as the Open Directory Project and Yahoo!” suggestion from its guidelines. One would accept this if mentioning Yahoo alone was removed as it’s an competitor. But why DMOZ? Does this mean Google also accepts the fact that DMOZ has lost all the importance it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seo-mind.com/directories/does-google-finally-accept-dmoz-failures.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DMOZ is Dead</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-mind.com/directories/dmoz-is-dead.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.seo-mind.com/directories/dmoz-is-dead.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny G Sam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botw.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMOZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google directory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-mind.com/directories/dmoz-is-dead.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br/>DMOZ is the Internet’s largest human edited directory. But the giant is dead long time back. It is quite ridiculous to think why Google still gives so much importance to the DMOZ listing when it is filled with broken, duplicate and promotional links. The multilingual open content directory owned by Netscape is maintained by a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seo-mind.com/directories/dmoz-is-dead.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

